Plastic. Since its development in the 1860’s, by Alexander Parkes, we’ve seen this amazingly diverse material mold into our houses via almost every object under the sun. From food containers to cutlery, pens and mobile phones, we’ve taken advantage of this revolutionary material and its adaptability, however was this a particularly wise move for the human race?
It’s cheap, and easy to make but at what cost?
As concluded by the the U.S. Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) and reported by senior author Scott Belcher, an associate professor of pharmacology at the University of Cincinnati, the chemical component of everyday plastic, Bisphenol A (BPA), is a major culprit behind the inefficient activity of the endocrine system. Put simply, BPA has the ability to imitate human hormones, disrupt proper hormone production, and attach itself to hormone receptors, even in low quantities.
The major fear has been BPA found in baby bottles. When polycarbonate plastic is heated the release of BPA is increased by 55 times. What does this mean for parents? As BPA enters the system it replicates the female hormone estradiol. This means that fetuses and infants are susceptible to prostate cancer, breast cancer, obesity and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Since its domestic introduction, we’ve seen a dramatic rise in the adult onset of chronic illnesses, such as those above.
It’s a scary thought, but surely there’s another side to the story?
According to the Plastics Division of the American Chemisty Council BPA has no negative effects on the human body. In fact BPA can “help to improve the health and safety of consumers.” You might be thinking how exactly can polycarbonate plastic, a derivative of crude oil, improve the health and safety of consumers?
“….plastics make possible bicycle helmets and child safety seats. They’re in the airbags that protect us and the cell phones that connect us.” Valid argument, however there’s just one thing missing. Where is the independent research which shows that BPA itself has no negative effects on humans? Research in favour of BPA has been conducted by none other than the American Chemistry Council, plastic division. Research results have also appeared by pro-BPA company Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group, whose executive director, Steven Hentges, Ph.D., is a member of the American Chemistry Council.
As the debate continues I ask that you take a step back and proceed with caution. We live in the age where the chemical manipulation of consumer products is increasingly wide spread, to the point that the average human is exposed to 80-100 thousand chemicals in one life time, only 2% of which have been tested. However, the decision is yours. Do you wish to play Russian roulette with your health and that of your kids? Let me know.
Andray
Sources:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov
Posted by andrayvoronov
Posted by andrayvoronov